The Retailer Winter edition_2020

Climate and sustainability

Packaging waste consultation unwrapped

ADRIAN HAWKES POLICY DIRECTOR Valpak Ltd

EXTENDED PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY FOR PACKAGING WASTE IS UNDERGOING A TRANSFORMATION AND VALPAK’S PROPOSED MANAGED COMPETITION SYSTEM IS GAINING GROUND AMONG STAKEHOLDERS In recent years, responsible retail has been at the forefront of new developments. Nowhere has this been more evident than for packaging design and recycling. At the advent of a new decade, we are on the brink of a transformation for packaging responsibility, but the details have yet to be finalised. Building on the four original options put forward by Government, an alternative, hybrid solution has been gaining widespread industry support. Since 1997, the UK has implemented EU Packaging Regulations through a unique, market-led system. Producers report annually on the volume of packaging they place on the market, and most join a compliance scheme which buys recycling evidence in the form of packaging recovery notes (PRNs) to demonstrate that the correct amount of recycling has taken place. Under this mechanism, recycling rates rose steadily, but as greater focus has been placed on resource use and environmental impacts for packaging – particularly plastics – modernisation is in the pipeline. Many retailers have been addressing the environmental issues of packaging waste voluntarily, or through collaborative, industry-wide programmes such as the UK Plastic Pact. At the same time, the adoption by the EU of the latest Circular Economy Package has committed to more stringent demands on packaging producers. Under the new regime, which has also been agreed by the UK government, retailers will be tasked with funding 100 per cent of the net costs of collection and recycling of waste packaging. The goal is to raise UK packaging recycling from 66 per cent to at least 70 per cent by 2030. Under our market-led system, retailers have already seen costs rise significantly over the past 18 months, but the new level of funding will see costs rise further still. The key to a successful new system is to find one that achieves the required level of funding for local authorities and recyclers, while also providing producers with greater transparency and a cost-effective service.

EPR reform The government consultation on extended producer responsibility (EPR) for packaging is due to resume later this year. While the structure of the new model is uncertain, what is clear is that producers will be required to pay at least 80 per cent of the cost of collection and recycling, which could mean bills up to five times higher than even current levels. Packflow Hybrid Model Valpak’s Packflow Hybrid Model – An Enhanced Approach to EPR Reform is the result of months of research and modelling. It summarises the strengths and weaknesses of both the UK’s existing scheme, and of overseas systems. We are continuing to work on the details of this concept in association with a number of other key players. After evaluating the four consultation models, Valpak introduced the idea of a hybrid approach that would combine and enhance the best qualities of the most popular two originally proposed systems. This new approach results in lower costs and greater transparency for producers, more consistent funding to local authorities and, importantly, it also includes funding for national and local recycling awareness campaigns. A single, not-for-profit organisation or producer management board would set a modulated fee that covers the full net costs of packaging collection by local authorities and approximately 80 per cent of full net costs of recycling. The remaining, smaller portion would be managed through competing Packaging Recovery Organisations – similar to current compliance schemes but operating in a much more strategic fashion, to help to ensure that focus remains on meeting recycling targets and producing the necessary investment in real recycling activity. For producers, the benefits are clear – as well as bringing efficiency and minimum cost, it would also give them a choice of service providers and the chance to be involved in innovative end market investments. Recyclers would have access to a higher quality of material, and support to make real strategic investment. Meanwhile, local authorities, which have previously largely missed out on PRN funding, would benefit from consistent, fair and stable funding, and also have a guaranteed outlet for the materials collected. In the current climate, where everyone from local authorities to producers is calling for greater transparency and an increase in processing in the UK, linking the different stakeholders and giving each greater involvement in strategic planning can only help the UK system to perform better and expand our home- grown recycling industry.

Producers would benefit from lower costs, a choice of service providers, and involvement in end market investments

40 | winter 2020 | the retailer